Tuesday 28 June 2011

Fossils of Extraterrestrials


asteroid 2011 md,india-to-announce-ufo-disclosure-soon,comet 2011,asteroid 2011md viewing india,india ufo disclosure,ufo disclosure,asteroid 2011 md viewing,june 2011 india ufo 
disclosure,ufo,2011 bc asteroid,2011md,2012 outback,2013ufo,alien signals received,ancient alliens,asteriod, june 25th 2011, earth,asteriods fulls in earth 2011,authenticated ufo sightings,clear ufo photos,comet earth 12000 2011,comet md 2011,disclouser ufo 2011,earthquare june 27th 2011,european nation to announce disclosure in 2011,fossils of extraterrestrials,ind china border mystery,india to announce ufo disclosure,india to announce ufo disclosure 
soon,india to make ufo disclosure,india ufo disclosure blog,indian ufo disclosure,one of the forces responsible for rapid progress of india,picture of ufo sightings,pictures of ufo sightings,ufo activity in nepal,ufo antarctica,ufo disclosure debate,ufo disclosure soon,ufo 
in india 2011,ufo india blogger,ufo near chandratal lake,ufo sightings,videosufo,visible from earth comet june 2011,ancient sanskrit from india tell ufo visited in 4,000 b.c,2013 comet 
panstarAccording to Evolution, when a giant rock smashed into the earth, Dinosaurs & ninety percent of the species vanished in an instant. The only survivors of this natural catastrophe were animals and plants which had already adapted to situations like ‘disasters’, such as ‘Droughts’. Animals like Rabbits, as rabbits can make deep burrows into soil, such animals remained safe, as they had already adapted to stay safe from predators.
Our present scientists estimate that this collision occurred 65 million years ago. Before this hazard all kind of Dinosaurs and Predators lived their natural instinct to hunt and eat. Now, let’s come back to the animals that survived this disaster. 

As according to Anthropologists at UC, Berkley the most likely common ancestor to ‘ The Great Apes’ was an animal similar to MOLES. The Great Apes consist of Humans, Gorillas, Chimps, Orangutans n others. This MOLE like animal which existed long back slowly transformed, by the very slow process of Evolution, which is very hard to detect. Evolution can be related to ‘Aging’ in humans and to other animals and plants. Like, when we are young we do not have beard or mustaches, but as we grow old they automatically appear on our faces. But, this is not a true comparison.

This MOLE soon became a BI-PEDALIAN (standing on 2 feet). After this a series of transformations happened. Soon it divided into various APES like creatures, EX: HOMO-HABBILUS. Homo-Habbilus is one of the prime concerns of today’s modern Human Anthropology.About 30 to 25 thousand years ago from now three more species occurred on earth. Evolutionary scientists classify them as 1. Chimps 2. Homo-sapiens & the third is ‘Neanderthals’

According to the theory of Intelligent Design, extra-terrestrials came to earth about 25 to 30 thousand years ago and created human beings. Now, the Neanderthals had bigger brains than Homo-Sapiens (DNA EVIDENCE PROOVES IT)They also buried their dead & might have been able to communicate with each other. Here’s the Question ‘Were Neanderthals these extraterrestrials? Speculations are there that they inter-bread with Humans, but today’s Human Genome carries no trace of Neanderthal DNA.

Reference:Ojas Johri

8 comments:

  1. Todays human DNA contains about 4% of Neanderthal. This is not true of the African Race. They have no trace of Neanderthal. This finding has come out recently within the year.

    ReplyDelete
  2. michaeldavino this year i saw a series in which it was said that today's human DNA contains no trace of neanderthal DNA(even i doubt it), However, as you say that Human DNA contains about 4% of neanderthal DNA, so its quite obvious they inter-bread, i already mentioned that on post.- Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here's a short clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4gCZ1sfCTI.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2mErfQi1mA.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4gCZ1sfCTI.

    ReplyDelete
  4. thank you for these videos....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your explanation of Intelligent design is a misrepresentation of what it is. Intelligent Design simply states that evolution is a possibility but that God started the ball rolling. In essence, the "theory"(very loosely used here-I could make a theory about anything no matter how ridiculous)is this: the world is too complex for there not to have something create it-something with intelligence. But the problem with this "theory" is it crumbles under the scrutiny of logic and science. Also, your Neanderthal evidence is wrong and this is huge because this is the main premise behind your question and without it, the article goes nowhere. Also, as a writer, it is not sincere in a piece of journalism or scientific writing to pose the point of the article at the end without delving into it. Otherwise you are just speculating and as you know, you can squeeze water from a stone when it comes to abstracting anything from anything.

    ReplyDelete
  6. dear Niko,
    It was made speculative, i did it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. niko you need to study human anthropology deeply, what I've written above is a comparison between HOMO-SAPIENS AND NEANDERTHALS, both of which are in contrast with 2 things , first is Evolution and Second is Intelligent Design, and remove the THEOLOGICAL WORDS SUCH AS 'GOD', DEMONS, GHOSTS FROM intelligent design. WHY? that's because in 2011 C.E we are living in scientific era and not the THEOLOGICAL ERA....read the three stage law by famous sociologist ' Sir. August Comte'.....it will clear ur confusion.....

    if u still are unable to understand ask me, i will explain in detail that why we cannot prove but only speculate... OK ...its 50-50...some speculations fall correct and the others are incorrect. i'll also send you a 2 hour lecture by paleo anthropologists who are famous professors at Berkeley.

    thank you niko for criticizing my article... i like debates and discussions with individualistic people like you... :)

    Ojas Johri...
    7/26/11

    ReplyDelete
  8. Just a few days ago I seen a report of quite high percentages of neanderthal DNA in all sorts of people. To dismiss this claim is absurd. Maybe the author should check his facts, not only does 'speed demon' seem a bit arrogant in this blog, but he also seems to think that no one else could possibly have a different conclusion than his. Good reporting takes into account all sides of the conversation, not just his own. I will not be returning to this blog, nor do I think I will share any of the biased information contained herein.

    ReplyDelete